Repair specific weak points
Use when the platform and core structure work, but copy, calls to action, forms, page information or speed need focused changes.
List the useful content, URLs, customer routes and technical limits first. That shows whether a focused improvement is enough or the foundation really needs replacing.
Use when the platform and core structure work, but copy, calls to action, forms, page information or speed need focused changes.
Use when the offer and pages have value, but navigation, visual hierarchy and mobile presentation make them difficult to use.
Use when the platform cannot safely support required performance, maintenance, content workflows or integrations.
List important pages, links from other websites, search impressions, useful content, contact routes, integrations and owned accounts. A plain page can still matter.
Record the current web address for every page that will move. Keep it where possible. Where change is necessary, map it once to the closest useful page and update links.
Capture a baseline for the outcomes that matter. Without a baseline, a prettier launch cannot demonstrate that visibility, speed or enquiries improved.
Define what a visitor must understand or complete and which pages carry that task.
Separate content, interface, technical and operational problems rather than grouping everything under 'old website'.
Preserve useful assets and test the agreed change against the original task after launch.
No. A redesign can retain valuable content and URLs, while focused improvements may solve a narrower problem with less migration risk.
When the current foundation cannot responsibly support security, maintenance, rendering, performance or required functions after realistic repair options are assessed.
Share the URL, goal and known constraints. VURM will review the existing foundation before recommending a route.
Discuss the right interventionReply from info@vurm.nl